For fun, I just did an image search for the term prosperity. 80% of the pictures that were returned depicted cash, gold or other symbols of wealth. But, as I noted before, wealth is only one dimension of overall well-being.
There is a ton of advice out there for teaching children the value of money. How do we teach our children how to value the importance of being happy and productive?
It starts by fostering creativity. And I fear that in many cases we may be short-changing our youth in in that regard through the quest for competitive advantage in academia.
An education system that focuses on results rather than process, as might develop in an environment where standardised testing is the primary measure of success, for example, can overlook the fundamental skills of critical thinking and analysis in favor of repetition and memorisation. While the short term effect might be adequate scores for the institution, long term we may unintentionally teach the children to focus on arbitrary goals at the expense of original thought.
Aileen Journey muses about this in a recent guest article on the Slow Leadership site.
In content-based, traditional education, the use to be made of the information is not as important as the fact that it gets into the child’s head and stays in long enough to take a test or write a paper. Process is learning how to think, how to approach an issue, how to analyze a problem and come up with a solution. Given the way the world works today, the process of being able to find information is likely to be more important than having that information already sitting in your head. That’s as true of management learning as it is of grade-school classes.
That’s certainly relevant, but I don’t think it goes deep enough. Traditional content-based education doesn’t stimulate enough introspection either. Children are taught by syllabus, by outline, by deadline and test. In the rush to get to the result, a passing grade, they aren’t given enough time to evaluate the context of the quest.
Don’t get me wrong; there is a definite need to teach basic skills. But successful education should go beyond that to teach reasoning, contextual awareness and, increasingly, collaborative methodology.
Leading a productive and satisfying life requires maintaining a delicate balance between insistent forces. If you are taught, however unintentionally, that success means the tireless pursuit of an unquestioned goal, or individual performance, then the critical skills necessary to maintain that balance in life might never properly develop.
Educators have a difficult challenge. Developing curriculum that encourages not only process development but introspection and creativity is only part of the problem. Coming up with ways to validate the process and demonstrate its value in a way that satisfies the government, taxpayers and parents is even more challenging.
#1 by Barb Dehn - February 9th, 2009 at 16:28
Roger,
You bring up an important consideration. “Traditional content-based education doesn’t stimulate enough introspection either.”
I couldn’t agree more, the rapid pace of our lives, leaves little room or time for introspection in adults and children. I wonder if that’s why Yoga is so popular now with women. It’s time set aside to clear the mind, while working with the body.
By the way, I like your blog.
Barb Dehn
#2 by Kim Baumgartner - February 12th, 2009 at 10:50
Amen.. Well Said
#3 by aahang - March 8th, 2009 at 13:14
Roger,
Let me congratulate you on having a very focused and collaborative approach in your blog.
Have been going through a lot of blogs to get a sense of how people think.
Blogs about poetry and art do not have posts on business and politics and vice versa.If a blog is a reflection of your mind are we saying that you cannot read a balance sheet and appreciate a couplet with the same brain.We have to learn to differentiate between life and livelihood else we will have all the problems you have highlighted in your above post.
#4 by justin locke - March 8th, 2009 at 14:31
well i agree with you more than you know, and I am in favor of radical education reform. I did a longer blog on this
http://justinlocke.typepad.com/art_and_commerce_justin_l/2008/12/a-radical-approach-to-education-reform.html
basically, the entire education system is based on the advancement and maintenance of the institution, and not on the buyer persona(e) of the student . . . those who do well in the sytem are those who support the system’s goals and convenience. (4 of the 5 richest americans, btw, are college dropouts)
it would be better to develop and focus each kid’s unique desire and THEN teach them basic skills as a means to fulfilling those intrinsic desires. but how much autonomy and freedom are we willing to give kids? and there is so much money to be made in maintaining the status quo. . .
I deal with teaching real creativity and the shortcomings and conformity training of the standard school system a great deal in my blogs and in my latest book, “principles of applied stupidity” . . . justin locke